Health co-benefits and mitigation costs as per the Paris Agreement under different technological pathways for energy supply.
Environ Int
; 136: 105513, 2020 03.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32006762
ABSTRACT
This study assesses the reductions in air pollution emissions and subsequent beneficial health effects from different global mitigation pathways consistent with the 2 °C stabilization objective of the Paris Agreement. We use an integrated modelling framework, demonstrating the need for models with an appropriate level of technology detail for an accurate co-benefit assessment. The framework combines an integrated assessment model (GCAM) with an air quality model (TM5-FASST) to obtain estimates of premature mortality and then assesses their economic cost. The results show that significant co-benefits can be found for a range of technological options, such as introducing a limitation on bioenergy, carbon capture and storage (CCS) or nuclear power. Cumulative premature mortality may be reduced by 17-23% by 2020-2050 compared to the baseline, depending on the scenarios. However, the ratio of health co-benefits to mitigation costs varies substantially, ranging from 1.45 when a bioenergy limitation is set to 2.19 when all technologies are available. As for regional disaggregation, some regions, such as India and China, obtain far greater co-benefits than others.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Saúde Ambiental
/
Poluentes Atmosféricos
/
Poluição do Ar
/
Fontes Geradoras de Energia
Tipo de estudo:
Health_economic_evaluation
País/Região como assunto:
Asia
/
Europa
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article