Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Literature Review of Brain Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain.
Deer, Timothy R; Falowski, Steven; Arle, Jeff E; Vesper, Jan; Pilitsis, Julie; Slavin, Konstantin V; Hancu, Maria; Grider, Jay S; Mogilner, Alon Y.
Afiliação
  • Deer TR; Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia.
  • Falowski S; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
  • Arle JE; Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Vesper J; Department of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Pilitsis J; Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
  • Slavin KV; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Hancu M; Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
  • Grider JS; UK HealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Mogilner AY; Department Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Pain Med ; 21(7): 1415-1420, 2020 11 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034418
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic literature review of brain neurostimulation for pain. DESIGN: Grade the evidence for deep brain neurostimulation (DBS). METHODS: An international, interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for brain stimulation. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were graded by two independent reviewers. General inclusion criteria were prospective trials (RCTs and observational) that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the United States Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria. RESULTS: Two high-quality RCTs and three observational trials supported DBS, resulting in Level II (moderate) evidence. CONCLUSION: Moderate evidence supports DBS to treat chronic pain. Additional Level I RCTs are needed to further the strength of the evidence in this important area of medicine, but the current evidence suggests that DBS should be considered as an option in treating complex pain cases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article