Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review.
Hardman, Ruth; Begg, Stephen; Spelten, Evelien.
Afiliação
  • Hardman R; La Trobe University Rural Health School, 471 Benetook Avenue, Mildura, Victoria, 3500, Australia. r.hardman@latrobe.edu.au.
  • Begg S; Sunraysia Community Health Services, 137 Thirteenth Street, Mildura, Victoria, 3500, Australia. r.hardman@latrobe.edu.au.
  • Spelten E; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria, 3552, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 150, 2020 Feb 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32106889
BACKGROUND: The social gradient in chronic disease (CD) is well-documented, and the ability to effectively self-manage is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality from CD. This systematic review aimed to assess the moderating effect of socioeconomic status on self-management support (SMS) interventions in relation to participation, retention and post-intervention outcomes. METHODS: Six databases were searched for studies of any design published until December 2018. Eligible studies reported on outcomes from SMS interventions for adults with chronic disease, where socioeconomic status was recorded and a between-groups comparison on SES was made. Possible outcomes were participation rates, retention rates and clinical or behavioural post-intervention results. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were retrieved, including five studies on participation, five on attrition and nine studies reporting on outcomes following SMS intervention. All participation studies reported reduced engagement in low SES cohorts. Studies assessing retention and post-intervention outcomes had variable results, related to the diversity of interventions. A reduction in health disparity was seen in longer interventions that were individually tailored. Most studies did not provide a theoretical justification for the intervention being investigated, although four studies referred to Bandura's concept of self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The limited research suggests that socioeconomic status does moderate the efficacy of SMS interventions, such that without careful tailoring and direct targeting of barriers to self-management, SMS may exacerbate the social gradient in chronic disease outcomes. Screening for patient disadvantage or workload, rather than simply recording SES, may increase the chances of tailored interventions being directed to those most likely to benefit from them. Future interventions for low SES populations should consider focussing more on treatment burden and patient capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration CRD42019124760. Registration date 17/4/19.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Apoio Social / Doença Crônica / Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Apoio Social / Doença Crônica / Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article