Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.
Lobban, Fiona; Akers, Nadia; Appelbe, Duncan; Chapman, Lesley; Collinge, Lizzi; Dodd, Susanna; Flowers, Sue; Hollingsworth, Bruce; Johnson, Sonia; Jones, Steven H; Mateus, Ceu; Mezes, Barbara; Murray, Elizabeth; Panagaki, Katerina; Rainford, Naomi; Robinson, Heather; Rosala-Hallas, Anna; Sellwood, William; Walker, Andrew; Williamson, Paula.
Afiliação
  • Lobban F; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. f.lobban@lancaster.ac.uk.
  • Akers N; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Appelbe D; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Chapman L; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Collinge L; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Dodd S; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Flowers S; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Hollingsworth B; Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Johnson S; University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
  • Jones SH; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Mateus C; Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Mezes B; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Murray E; e-Health and Primary Care, Primary Care & Population Health Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Faculty of Pop Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
  • Panagaki K; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Rainford N; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Robinson H; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Rosala-Hallas A; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Sellwood W; Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Walker A; Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Williamson P; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMC Psychiatry ; 20(1): 160, 2020 04 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290827
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support.

AIMS:

Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of REACT including a Resource Directory (RD), versus RD-only.

METHODS:

A primarily online, observer-blind randomised controlled trial comparing REACT (including RD) with RD only (registration ISRCTN72019945). Participants were UK relatives aged > = 16, with high distress (assessed using the GHQ-28), and actively help-seeking, individually randomised, and assessed online. Primary outcome was relatives' distress (GHQ-28) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing, support, costs and user feedback.

RESULTS:

We recruited 800 relatives (REACT = 399; RD only = 401) with high distress at baseline (GHQ-28 REACT mean 40.3, SD 14.6; RD only mean 40.0, SD 14.0). Median time spent online on REACT was 50.8 min (IQR 12.4-172.1) versus 0.5 min (IQR 0-1.6) on RD only. Retention to primary follow-up (24 weeks) was 75% (REACT n = 292 (73.2%); RD-only n = 307 (76.6%)). Distress decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups (- 1.39, 95% CI -3.60, 0.83, p = 0.22). Estimated cost of delivering REACT was £62.27 per person and users reported finding it safe, acceptable and convenient. There were no adverse events or reported side effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

REACT is an inexpensive, acceptable, and safe way to deliver NICE-recommended support for relatives. However, for highly distressed relatives it is no more effective in reducing distress (GHQ-28) than a comprehensive online resource directory. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN72019945 prospectively registered 19/11/2015.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Transtorno Bipolar / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Psicóticos / Transtorno Bipolar / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article