Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wide Gastric Conduit Increases the Risk of Benign Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Zhu, Dong-Shan; Cao, Jian-Wei; Geng, Ming-Fei; Huang, Xiao-Yu; Hu, Chong-Ming; Li, Jian; Fu, Dong-Hong; Liu, Wei.
Afiliação
  • Zhu DS; 12510 Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Cao JW; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Geng MF; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Huang XY; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Hu CM; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Li J; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Fu DH; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang, China.
  • Liu W; 12510 Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Am Surg ; 86(6): 621-627, 2020 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683957
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To identify the association between the width of the gastric conduit and the benign anastomotic stricture (BAS) after esophagectomy with end-to-side cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

METHODS:

Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between July 2013 and July 2014 were included in this study. The gastric conduit was used for reconstruction in all patients and end-to-side cervical anastomosis were performed using a circular stapler. The patients were divided into a narrow group (3-5 cm) and a wide group (>5 cm) based on the gastric conduit width. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze the possible factors (patients' age, gender, preoperative comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gastric conduit width, anastomotic leakage) that could affect the incidence of BAS.

RESULTS:

Two-hundred and one patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 29 months (17-58 months). Seven cases (3.5%) showed anastomotic leakage in the postoperative period and 38 patients (18.9%) developed BAS; all within the first year of follow-up. In univariate analysis, the width of the gastric conduit was the only risk factor for the development of BAS (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36, P = .005). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the wide group was an independent significant risk factor for the development of BAS developing compared with the narrow group (OR = 2.84, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS:

A wide gastric conduit width (>5 cm) is an independent risk factor for the development of BAS after esophagectomy and stapled cervical end-to-side anastomosis for esophageal cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Esofagectomia / Constrição Patológica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Esofagectomia / Constrição Patológica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article