Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Asian-specific vertical cup-to-disc ratio cut-off for glaucoma screening: An evidence-based recommendation from a multi-ethnic Asian population.
Soh, Zhi Da; Chee, Miao Li; Thakur, Sahil; Tham, Yih Chung; Tao, Yijin; Lim, Zhi Wei; Mani, Baskaran; Wong, Tina T; Aung, Tin; Cheng, Ching-Yu.
Afiliação
  • Soh ZD; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chee ML; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Thakur S; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tham YC; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tao Y; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Lim ZW; School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Mani B; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Wong TT; Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program (Eye ACP), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Aung T; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Cheng CY; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 48(9): 1210-1218, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734654
IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based guidelines are essential for glaucoma screening to work effectively. BACKGROUND: To derive a vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) cut-off for glaucoma screening in a multi-ethnic Asian population. DESIGN: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) study is a population-based study conducted from 2004 to 2011 in a single tertiary care research institute. PARTICIPANTS: SEED comprised of 10 033 Chinese, Malay and Indian adults aged ≥40 (response rate 75.6%). After excluding participants with a history of glaucoma medication or surgery, 9673 participants were included for analysis. METHODS: A systematic eye examination, which included applanation tonometry, visual field testing, gonioscopy and dilated fundus examination was conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of glaucoma. RESULTS: The distribution of VCDR and VCDR asymmetry were relatively homogenous in this multi-ethnic Asian population, with a 97.5th percentile value of 0.67 and 0.17, respectively. In the absence of more definite signs of glaucoma, VCDR ≥0.60 and VCDR asymmetry ≥0.20 provided the best balance between sensitivity (95.1%) and specificity (90.9%) in detecting glaucoma. For larger optic disc (≥2.0 mm), VCDR ≥0.65 with VCDR asymmetry ≥0.20 provided the best balance between sensitivity (84.8%) and specificity (93.2%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Overall, VCDR ≥0.60 with VCDR ≥0.20 asymmetry provides a good balance between sensitivity and specificity in detecting glaucoma. For larger optic disc, VCDR ≥0.65 should be considered instead to mitigate against false-referrals due to larger physiological disc cupping. Our findings may act as a reference to populations with similar VCDR distribution.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Glaucoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Glaucoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article