Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indicators to evaluate organisational knowledge brokers: a scoping review.
Scarlett, Julia; Forsberg, Birger C; Biermann, Olivia; Kuchenmüller, Tanja; El-Khatib, Ziad.
Afiliação
  • Scarlett J; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Forsberg BC; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Biermann O; Region Stockholm, Hantverkargatan 11B, 112 21, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Kuchenmüller T; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • El-Khatib Z; World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 93, 2020 Aug 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32831095
BACKGROUND: Knowledge translation (KT) is currently endorsed by global health policy actors as a means to improve outcomes by institutionalising evidence-informed policy-making. Organisational knowledge brokers, comprised of researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders, are increasingly being used to undertake and promote KT at all levels of health policy-making, though few resources exist to guide the evaluation of these efforts. Using a scoping review methodology, we identified, synthesised and assessed indicators that have been used to evaluate KT infrastructure and capacity-building activities in a health policy context in order to inform the evaluation of organisational knowledge brokers. METHODS: A scoping review methodology was used. This included the search of Medline, Global Health and the WHO Library databases for studies regarding the evaluation of KT infrastructure and capacity-building activities between health research and policy, published in English from 2005 to 2016. Data on study characteristics, outputs and outcomes measured, related indicators, mode of verification, duration and/or frequency of collection, indicator methods, KT model, and targeted capacity level were extracted and charted for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1073 unique articles were obtained and 176 articles were qualified to be screened in full-text; 32 articles were included in the analysis. Of a total 213 indicators extracted, we identified 174 (174/213; 81.7%) indicators to evaluate the KT infrastructure and capacity-building that have been developed using methods beyond expert opinion. Four validated instruments were identified. The 174 indicators are presented in 8 domains based on an adaptation of the domains of the Lavis et al. framework of linking research to action - general climate, production of research, push efforts, pull efforts, exchange efforts, integrated efforts, evaluation and capacity-building. CONCLUSION: This review presents a total of 174 method-based indicators to evaluate KT infrastructure and capacity-building. The presented indicators can be used or adapted globally by organisational knowledge brokers and other stakeholders in their monitoring and evaluation work.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica / Fortalecimento Institucional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica / Fortalecimento Institucional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article