Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncology after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma, Lushun; Pang, Xinyuan; Ji, Guofeng; Sun, Haojie; Fan, Qihao; Ma, Chong.
Afiliação
  • Ma L; Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
  • Pang X; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • Ji G; Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
  • Sun H; Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
  • Fan Q; Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
  • Ma C; Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(37): e22139, 2020 Sep 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925766
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious clinical complication after anterior resection for rectal cancer and will lead to an increase in postoperative mortality. However, the effect on long-term oncology outcomes remains controversial.

METHODS:

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for related articles. The included studies assessed local recurrence, distant recurrence, overall survival, cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. The systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The combined RRs with 95% CI were then calculated using a fixed effects model or a randomized effect model.

RESULTS:

A total of 18 cohort studies included 34,487 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that AL was associated with increased local recurrence (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14-1.90, I = 57.8%). Anastomotic leakage decreased overall survival (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96, I = 58.1%), cancer-specific survival (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00, I = 30.4%), and disease-free survival (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94, I = 80.4%). Distant recurrence may had no significant effects of AL (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91-1.46, I = 58.4%).

CONCLUSION:

AL has a negative effect on local recurrence and long-term survival (including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival) after anterior resection for rectal cancer, but not related to distant recurrence.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article