Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the Japanese version of the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire in a large observational cohort: A two-year prospective study.
Okamoto, Yuko; Katsumata, Yasuhiro; Baba, Sayumi; Kawaguchi, Yasushi; Harigai, Masayoshi.
Afiliação
  • Okamoto Y; Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Katsumata Y; Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Baba S; Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kawaguchi Y; Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Harigai M; Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mod Rheumatol ; 31(4): 834-842, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990111
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to assess accumulated damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to translate it into Japanese and further investigate its validity and reliability.

METHODS:

The English version of the LDIQ was translated into Japanese and administered to Japanese patients with SLE (n = 259) at our university clinic. Physicians simultaneously completed the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI) and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Patients were prospectively followed for a repeat assessment the following year.

RESULTS:

The median LDIQ score was 2.0. The LDIQ demonstrated substantial correlation with the SDI but poor correlation with the SLEDAI-2K (Spearman's ρ = 0.75 and -0.08, respectively). These results suggested its convergent and discriminant validity. The LDIQ demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85). When the effect size and standardized response mean for the LDIQ were assessed only in patients who had a change ≥1 in the SDI, they demonstrated a small to moderate responsiveness 0.43 and 0.59, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The Japanese version of the LDIQ had acceptable reliability and validity and its performance was comparable with the original version.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traduções / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Inquéritos e Questionários / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traduções / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Inquéritos e Questionários / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article