Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A joint analysis strategy reveals genetic changes associated with artificial selection between egg-type and meat-type ducks.
Gu, H; Zhu, T; Li, X; Chen, Y; Wang, L; Lv, X; Yang, W; Jia, Y; Jiang, Z; Qu, L.
Afiliação
  • Gu H; Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Zhu T; Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Li X; College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Daizong Street #61, Tai'an, Shandong, 271018, China.
  • Chen Y; Beijing Municipal General Station of Animal Science, Beiyuan Road 15A#, Beijing, 100107, China.
  • Wang L; Beijing Municipal General Station of Animal Science, Beiyuan Road 15A#, Beijing, 100107, China.
  • Lv X; Beijing Municipal General Station of Animal Science, Beiyuan Road 15A#, Beijing, 100107, China.
  • Yang W; Beijing Municipal General Station of Animal Science, Beiyuan Road 15A#, Beijing, 100107, China.
  • Jia Y; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Jiang Z; Department of Animal Sciences, center for Reproductive Biology, Veterinary and Biomedical Research Building, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 647010, USA.
  • Qu L; Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing, 100193, China.
Anim Genet ; 51(6): 890-898, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058234
ABSTRACT
Egg-type ducks and meat-type ducks are predominantly commercial or indigenous and have been subjected to artificial directional selection. These two duck types differ substantially in body shape, production performance and reproductivity. However, the genetic changes associated with phenotypic differences remain unclear. Here, we compared the two duck types at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. We identified a large number of SNPs and genes in genomic divergent regions in terms of FST and θπ values. The corresponding genes were mainly enriched in embryonic development function and metabolic pathway. RNA-seq analysis also revealed differential gene expression in the liver and gonads. The differentially expressed genes were functionally associated with signal transmission and substance metabolism respectively. Furthermore, we found that seven genes were related to differentiation between the two types by both g genome and transcriptome analysis and were plausible candidate genes. These genes were annotated to GO categories of cell development and disease immunity. These findings will enable a better understanding of the artificial selection history of meat and egg ducks and provide a valuable resource for future research on the breeding of these two lineages.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genoma / Patos / Transcriptoma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genoma / Patos / Transcriptoma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article