Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the Physiologic Endotypes Responsible for REM- and NREM-Based OSA.
Joosten, Simon A; Landry, Shane A; Wong, Ai-Ming; Mann, Dwayne L; Terrill, Philip I; Sands, Scott A; Turton, Anthony; Beatty, Caroline; Thomson, Luke; Hamilton, Garun S; Edwards, Bradley A.
Afiliação
  • Joosten SA; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; The School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Partners-Epworth, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: drjoosten@hotmail.com.
  • Landry SA; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Discovery Institute, and the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Au
  • Wong AM; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; The School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mann DL; School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Terrill PI; School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Sands SA; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Turton A; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
  • Beatty C; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Discovery Institute, and the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Au
  • Thomson L; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Discovery Institute, and the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Au
  • Hamilton GS; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; The School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Partners-Epworth, Victoria, Australia.
  • Edwards BA; Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Discovery Institute, and the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Au
Chest ; 159(5): 1998-2007, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197399
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with OSA can have the majority of their respiratory events in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep or in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. No previous studies have linked the different physiologic conditions in REM and NREM sleep to the common polysomnographic patterns seen in everyday clinical practice, namely REM predominant OSA (REMOSA) and NREM predominant OSA (NREMOSA). RESEARCH QUESTION (1) How does OSA physiologic condition change with sleep stage in patients with NREMOSA and REMOSA? (2) Do patients with NREMOSA and REMOSA have different underlying OSA pathophysiologic conditions? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We recruited patients with three polysomnographic patterns. (1) REMOSA twice as many respiratory events in REM sleep, (2) NREMOSA twice as many events in NREM sleep, and (3) uniform OSA equal number of events in NREM/REM sleep. We deployed a noninvasive phenotyping method to determine OSA endotype traits (Vpassive, Vactive, loop gain, arousal threshold) in NREM sleep, REM sleep, and total night sleep in each group of patients (NREMOSA, REMOSA, uniform OSA).

RESULTS:

Patients with NREMOSA have significantly worse ventilatory control stability in NREM sleep compared with REM sleep (loop gain, 0.546 [0.456,0.717] in NREM vs 0.365 [0.238,0.459] in REM sleep; P = .0026). Patients with REMOSA displayed a significantly more collapsible airway (ie, lower Vpassive) in REM compared with NREM sleep (98.4 [97.3,99.2] %Veupnea in NREM vs 95.9 [86.4,98.9] %Veupnea in REM sleep; P < .0001). The major between-group difference across the whole night was a significantly higher loop gain in the NREMOSA group (0.561 [0.429,0.675]) compared with the REMOSA group (0.459 [0.388,0.539]; P = .0033).

INTERPRETATION:

This study is the first to link long-recognized polysomnographic patterns of OSA to underlying physiologic differences. Patients with NREMOSA have a higher loop gain in NREM sleep; patients with REMOSA have a worsening of Vpassive in REM sleep.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sono REM / Fases do Sono / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sono REM / Fases do Sono / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article