Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in older patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: an age-specific subgroup analysis of MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.
Goetz, Matthew P; Okera, Meena; Wildiers, Hans; Campone, Mario; Grischke, Eva-Maria; Manso, Luis; André, Valérie A M; Chouaki, Nadia; San Antonio, Belén; Toi, Masakazu; Sledge, George W.
Afiliação
  • Goetz MP; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Goetz.Matthew@mayo.edu.
  • Okera M; Adelaide Cancer Center, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Wildiers H; Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Campone M; Institut de Cancerologie de L'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France.
  • Grischke EM; Women's Hospital, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Manso L; 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • André VAM; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France.
  • Chouaki N; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France.
  • San Antonio B; Eli Lilly and Company, Madrid, Spain.
  • Toi M; Breast Cancer Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Sledge GW; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 186(2): 417-428, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392835
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated significant efficacy benefits in HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer patients in the Phase 3 studies MONARCH 2 (fulvestrant as ET) and MONARCH 3 (letrozole or anastrozole as ET). Here, we report age-specific safety and efficacy outcomes.

METHODS:

Exploratory analyses of MONARCH 2 and 3 were performed for 3 age groups (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years). For safety, data were pooled from both studies; for efficacy, a subgroup analysis of PFS was performed for each trial independently.

RESULTS:

Pooled safety data were available for 1152 patients. Clinically relevant diarrhea (Grade 2/3) was higher in older patients receiving abemaciclib + ET (<65, 39.5%; 65-74, 45.2%; ≥75, 55.4%) versus placebo + ET (<65, 6.8%; 65-74, 4.5%; ≥75, 16.0%). Nausea, decreased appetite, and venous thromboembolic events were all moderately higher in older patients. Neutropenia (Grade ≥ 3) did not differ as a function of age in the abemaciclib + ET arm (<65, 25.8%; 65-74, 27.4%; ≥75, 18.1%). Dose adjustments and discontinuation rates were slightly higher in older patients. Abemaciclib + ET improved PFS compared with placebo + ET independent of patient age, with no significant difference in abemaciclib treatment effect between the 3 age groups (MONARCH 2 interaction p-value, 0.695; MONARCH 3 interaction p-value, 0.634). Estimated hazard ratios ranged from 0.523-0.633 (MONARCH 2) and 0.480-0.635 (MONARCH 3).

CONCLUSIONS:

While higher rates of adverse events were reported in older patients, they were manageable with dose adjustments and concomitant medication. Importantly, a consistent efficacy benefit was observed across all age groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02107703 (first posted April 8, 2014) and NCT02246621 (first posted September 23, 2014).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article