Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of a new integrated computer-assisted system (CADe/CADx) for detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia.
Weigt, Jochen; Repici, Alessandro; Antonelli, Giulio; Afifi, Ahmed; Kliegis, Leon; Correale, Loredana; Hassan, Cesare; Neumann, Helmut.
Afiliação
  • Weigt J; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Repici A; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Antonelli G; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
  • Afifi A; Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Kliegis L; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Correale L; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Hassan C; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Neumann H; Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Endoscopy ; 54(2): 180-184, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33494106
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Use of artificial intelligence may increase detection of colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy by improving lesion recognition (CADe) and reduce pathology costs by improving optical diagnosis (CADx).

METHODS:

A multicenter library of ≥ 200 000 images from 1572 polyps was used to train a combined CADe/CADx system. System testing was performed on two independent image sets (CADe 446 with polyps, 234 without; CADx 267) from 234 polyps, which were also evaluated by six endoscopists (three experts, three non-experts).

RESULTS:

CADe showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.9 %, 90.6 %, and 91.7 %, respectively. Experts showed significantly higher accuracy and specificity, and similar sensitivity, while non-experts + CADe showed comparable sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy than CADe and experts. CADx showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.0 %, 79.4 %, and 83.6 %, respectively. Experts showed comparable performance, whereas non-experts + CADx showed comparable accuracy but lower specificity than CADx and experts.

CONCLUSIONS:

The high accuracy shown by CADe and CADx was similar to that of experts, supporting further evaluation in a clinical setting. When using CAD, non-experts achieved a similar performance to experts, with suboptimal specificity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Juniperus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Juniperus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article