Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Metamodeling to Identify the Optimal Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Koffijberg, Hendrik; Degeling, Koen; IJzerman, Maarten J; Coupé, Veerle M H; Greuter, Marjolein J E.
Afiliação
  • Koffijberg H; Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.koffijberg@utwente.nl.
  • Degeling K; Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • IJzerman MJ; Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne School
  • Coupé VMH; Decision Modeling Center, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Greuter MJE; Decision Modeling Center, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Value Health ; 24(2): 206-215, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33518027
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Metamodeling can address computational challenges within decision-analytic modeling studies evaluating many strategies. This article illustrates the value of metamodeling for evaluating colorectal cancer screening strategies while accounting for colonoscopy capacity constraints.

METHODS:

In a traditional approach, the best screening strategy was identified from a limited subset of strategies evaluated with the validated Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model. In a metamodeling approach, metamodels were fitted to this limited subset to evaluate all potentially plausible strategies and determine the best overall screening strategy. Approaches were compared based on the best screening strategy in life-years gained compared with no screening. Metamodel runtime and accuracy was assessed.

RESULTS:

The metamodeling approach evaluated >40 000 strategies in <1 minute with high accuracy after 1 adaptive sampling step (mean absolute error 0.0002 life-years) using 300 samples in total (generation time 8 days). Findings indicated that health outcomes could be improved without requiring additional colonoscopy capacity. Obtaining similar insights using the traditional approach could require at least 1000 samples (generation time 28 days). Suggested benefits from screening at ages <40 years require adequate validation of the underlying Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model before making policy recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Metamodeling allows rapid assessment of a vast set of strategies, which may lead to identification of more favorable strategies compared to a traditional approach. Nevertheless, metamodel validation and identifying extrapolation beyond the support of the original decision-analytic model are critical to the interpretation of results. The screening strategies identified with metamodeling support ongoing discussions on decreasing the starting age of colorectal cancer screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Modelos Estatísticos / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Modelos Estatísticos / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article