Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergency department methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nare screen effect on pneumonia treatment duration.
Renzoni, Anthony J; Peksa, Gary D; DeMott, Joshua M.
Afiliação
  • Renzoni AJ; Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: anthony.renzoni@uconn.edu.
  • Peksa GD; Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: gary_d_peksa@rush.edu.
  • DeMott JM; Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: joshua_demott@rush.edu.
Am J Emerg Med ; 44: 68-71, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581603
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if performing a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screen in the emergency department (ED) decreased general medicine patient exposure to anti-MRSA antibiotics for pneumonia. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients who had a diagnosis of pneumonia and were initiated on anti-MRSA therapy (vancomycin or linezolid) in the ED and subsequently admitted to a general medicine floor. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) did not receive a MRSA nares screen in the ED (No MRSA screen group) or 2) received a MRSA nares screen in the ED (MRSA screen group). The primary outcome was anti-MRSA antibiotic duration. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin level evaluation, hospital survival, and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients included, 37 patients received a MRSA nares screen in the ED and 79 patients did not. Median duration of antibiotic exposure was similar for both groups (No MRSA screen, 30.5 h [interquartile range (IQR) 20.5-52.5] vs. MRSA screen, 24.5 h [IQR 20.6-40.3]; p = 0.28). Of patients who were screened, 35 were negative and 2 were positive. Secondary outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: Performing a MRSA nares screen in the ED for patients diagnosed with pneumonia, initiated on anti-MRSA antibiotics, and admitted to a general medicine floor did not decrease duration of anti-MRSA antibiotics. At this time, ED providers do not need to consider a MRSA nasal screen in the ED for patients being admitted to general medicine, although larger studies could be considered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Estafilocócica / Programas de Rastreamento / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina / Cavidade Nasal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Estafilocócica / Programas de Rastreamento / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina / Cavidade Nasal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article