Glycaemic control in transition-aged versus early adults with type 1 diabetes and the effect of a government-funded insulin pump programme.

AIM: To compare glycaemic control and adverse outcomes between transition-aged and early adults with type 1 diabetes, and the impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy funded through a government Assisted Devices Program. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study using healthcare administrative databases from Ontario, Canada included adults aged 18-35 with type 1 diabetes between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2014. Mean HbA1c was compared between transition-aged (18-24 years) and early adults (25-35 years), overall and stratified by whether or not they received government-funded CSII therapy (CSII vs. non-CSII). Secondary outcomes included rates of hospitalizations/emergency department visits for hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia over a 3-year follow-up. Comparisons were adjusted for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Among 7157 participants with type 1 diabetes, mean HbA1c was significantly higher for transition-aged compared to early adults (71 mmol/mol [8.68%] vs. 64 mmol/mol [8.04%], p < 0.0001). This difference was smaller among CSII compared to non-CSII users (p = 0.02 for interaction between age group and CSII use). The transition-age group were more likely to experience a hyperglycaemic event compared to early adults (adjusted risk ratio, aRR: 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.96), which was attenuated by CSII use (aRR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.7-1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Transition-aged adults with type 1 diabetes had a significantly higher mean HbA1c and risk of hyperglycaemic events compared to early adults. This difference was attenuated for CSII users, indicating that a government-funded CSII programme is associated with narrowing of the gap in glycaemic control and associated adverse outcomes for this population.