Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of different materials used for sealing of implant abutment access channel and the peri-implant sulcus microbiota: A 6-month, randomized controlled trial.
Rubino, Caroline V; Katz, Brandon G; Langlois, Kylie; Wang, Howard H; Carrion, Julio A; Walker, Stephen G; Collier, Jackie L; Iacono, Vincent J; Myneni, Srinivas R.
Afiliação
  • Rubino CV; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Katz BG; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Langlois K; School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Wang HH; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Carrion JA; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Walker SG; Department of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Collier JL; School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Iacono VJ; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Myneni SR; Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(8): 941-950, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129715
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Peri-implantitis has been attributed to a myriad of factors, including microleakage at the abutment-implant interface. Implant abutment access channel sealing materials (IACSM) are readily used in implant dentistry, with little evidence on their effect on microleakage. This study aims to evaluate the effect of IACSM on the microbial composition in the implant access channel and the peri-implant sulcus.

METHODS:

A total of n = 8 patients (64 implants) were included in this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, whereas four different materials (cotton, polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE], synthetic foam, or polyvinyl siloxane [PVS]) were randomly placed as an IACSM. Following 6 months, microbial analysis was completed on the IACSM and samples from the peri-implant sulci via PCR and high-throughput sequencing. Bacterial samples on the IACSM and in the peri-implant sulci were classified according to Socransky's microbial complexes.

RESULTS:

There was a preponderance of early colonizing bacteria within the IACSM, while the peri-implant sulci were dominated by Orange complex bacteria. The proportion of Red and Orange complex members on the IACSM was significantly less than in the peri-implant sulci. The proportion of Green, Yellow, and Blue complex members found on the IACSM was significantly greater than in the peri-implant sulci. Atopobium, a diverse species not included in the microbial complexes, was frequently detected in the peri-implant sulcus samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

No detectable effects of IACSM on the microbial community in the peri-implant sulcus or on the IACSM were identified. Variation of bacterial species was most dependent on the individual patient. No significant differences were found in the periodontal parameters between the different treatment groups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Peri-Implantite / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Peri-Implantite / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article