Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image-guided Microinvasive Percutaneous Treatment of Breast Lesions: Where Do We Stand?
Roknsharifi, Shima; Wattamwar, Kapil; Fishman, Michael D C; Ward, Robert C; Ford, Kelly; Faintuch, Salomao; Joshi, Surekha; Dialani, Vandana.
Afiliação
  • Roknsharifi S; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Wattamwar K; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Fishman MDC; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Ward RC; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Ford K; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Faintuch S; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Joshi S; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
  • Dialani V; From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (S.R., K.W.); Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (M.D.C.F.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island
Radiographics ; 41(4): 945-966, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34197250
ABSTRACT
Treatment of breast lesions has evolved toward the use of less-invasive or minimally invasive techniques. Minimally invasive treatments destroy focal groups of cells without surgery; hence, less anesthesia is required, better cosmetic outcomes are achieved because of minimal (if any) scarring, and recovery times are shorter. These techniques include cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused US, laser therapy, vacuum-assisted excision, and irreversible electroporation. Each modality involves the use of different mechanisms and requires specific considerations for application. To date, only cryoablation and vacuum-assisted excision have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of fibroadenomas and have been implemented as part of the treatment algorithm by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Several clinical studies on this topic have been performed on outcomes in patients with breast cancer who were treated with these techniques. The results are promising, with more data for radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation available than for other minimally invasive methods for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Clinical decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, according to the availability of the technique. MRI is the most effective imaging modality for postprocedural follow-up, with the pattern of enhancement differentiating residual or recurrent disease from postprocedural changes. ©RSNA, 2021.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Fibroadenoma / Criocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Fibroadenoma / Criocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article