Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Screening Modality on the Detection of Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ and Adenocarcinoma.
Zhang, Ran C; Vue, Nujsaubnusi C; Obasi, Lisa U; Vogel, Rachel I; Subramanian, Amar T; Khalifa, Mahmoud A; Reddy, Buvana R; Erickson, Britt K.
Afiliação
  • Zhang RC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
  • Vue NC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Obasi LU; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Vogel RI; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Subramanian AT; HealthPartners, Saint Paul, MN.
  • Khalifa MA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Reddy BR; HealthPartners, Saint Paul, MN.
  • Erickson BK; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 25(4): 267-269, 2021 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265818
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of screening modality on the detection of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with AIS or adenocarcinoma who had undergone routine screening with cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) cotesting between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients were stratified into 3 groups by screening test

results:

(1) HPV positive with abnormal cytology (HPV+/Pap+), (2) HPV negative with abnormal cytology (HPV-/Pap+), and (3) HPV positive with normal cytology (HPV+/Pap-). Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Data were analyzed with χ2, Fisher exact tests, and t tests as appropriate.

RESULTS:

Of the 118 patients diagnosed with AIS (n = 97) or adenocarcinoma (n = 21) after abnormal screening tests, 92 (78%) were detected by HPV+/Pap+, 15 (12.7%) were HPV+/Pap-, and 11 (9.3%) were HPV-/Pap+. Demographics were similar between groups, although the HPV+/Pap- patients had higher body mass indices. Rates of definitive hysterectomy were similar between groups (53.3%-80.0%, p = .11).

CONCLUSIONS:

In our cohort, a significant proportion of AIS and adenocarcinoma was detected by both HPV alone (with normal cytology) and cytology alone (with negative HPV), suggesting that cotesting with both HPV and cytology may be a more sensitive method of detection of AIS and adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenocarcinoma / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Adenocarcinoma in Situ Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenocarcinoma / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Adenocarcinoma in Situ Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article