Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ABSTRACT
We evaluated the performance of self-collected anterior nasal swab (ANS) and saliva samples compared with healthcare worker-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens used to test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We used the same PCR diagnostic panel to test all self-collected and healthcare worker-collected samples from participants at a public hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Among 1,076 participants, 51.9% were men, 57.1% were >50 years of age, 81.2% were Black (non-Hispanic), and 74.9% reported >1 chronic medical condition. In total, 8.0% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared with nasopharyngeal swab samples, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 59% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 68%. Among participants tested 3-7 days after symptom onset, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 80% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 85%. Sensitivity varied by specimen type and patient characteristics. These findings can help physicians interpret PCR results for SARS-CoV-2.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged80 / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged80 / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article