Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
When Azoles Cannot Be Used: The Clinical Effectiveness of Intermittent Liposomal Amphotericin Prophylaxis in Hematology Patients.
Batchelor, R; Thomas, C; Gardiner, B J; Lee, S J; Fleming, S; Wei, A; Coutsouvelis, J; Ananda-Rajah, M.
Afiliação
  • Batchelor R; Department of General Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Thomas C; Department of General Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gardiner BJ; Department of Infectious Diseases Alfred Health Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lee SJ; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Fleming S; Department of Infectious Diseases Alfred Health Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wei A; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Coutsouvelis J; Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Alfred Health Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ananda-Rajah M; Department of Haematology, Alfred Health Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab113, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34337090
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients unable to take azoles are a neglected group lacking a standardized approach to antifungal prophylaxis. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of intermittent liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) prophylaxis in a heterogenous group of hematology patients.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort of all hematology patients who received a course of intravenous L-AMB, defined as 1 mg/kg thrice weekly from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2018, were identified from pharmacy records. Outcomes included breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD), reasons for premature discontinuation, and acute kidney injury.

RESULTS:

There were 198 patients who received 273 courses of L-AMB prophylaxis. Using a conservative definition, the BIFD rate was 9.6% (n = 19 of 198) occurring either during L-AMB prophylaxis or up to 7 days from cessation in patients who received a course. Probable/proven BIFD occurred in 13 patients (6.6%, 13 of 198), including molds in 54% (n = 7) and non-albicans Candidemia in 46% (n = 6). Cumulative incidence of BIFD was highest in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (6.8%) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2.7%) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (2.5%). The most common indication for L-AMB was chemotherapy, or anticancer drug-azole interactions (75% of courses) dominated by vincristine, or acute myeloid leukemia clinical trials, followed by gut absorption concerns (13%) and liver function abnormalities (8.8%). Acute kidney injury, using a modified international definition, complicated 27% of courses but was not clinically significant, accounting for only 3.3% (9 of 273) of discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings demonstrate a high rate of BIFD among patients receiving L-AMB prophylaxis. Pragmatic trials will help researchers find the optimal regimen of L-AMB prophylaxis for the many clinical scenarios in which azoles are unsuitable, especially as targeted anticancer drugs increase in use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article