Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.
Cooley, Lauren Folgosa; Emeka, Adaeze A; Meyers, Travis J; Cooper, Phillip R; Lin, Daniel W; Finelli, Antonio; Eastham, James A; Logothetis, Christopher J; Marks, Leonard S; Vesprini, Danny; Goldenberg, S Larry; Higano, Celestia S; Pavlovich, Christian P; Chan, June M; Morgan, Todd M; Klein, Eric A; Barocas, Daniel A; Loeb, Stacy; Helfand, Brian T; Scholtens, Denise M; Witte, John S; Catalona, William J.
Afiliação
  • Cooley LF; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Emeka AA; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Meyers TJ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Cooper PR; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Lin DW; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington.
  • Finelli A; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Eastham JA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Logothetis CJ; Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Marks LS; Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Vesprini D; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Goldenberg SL; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health and Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Higano CS; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Pavlovich CP; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Chan JM; The Brady Urological Institute, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Morgan TM; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Klein EA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Barocas DA; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Loeb S; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Helfand BT; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Scholtens DM; Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Witte JS; Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois.
  • Catalona WJ; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1147-1156, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503355
PURPOSE: We examined the demographic and clinicopathological parameters associated with the time to convert from active surveillance to treatment among men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional cohort of 7,279 patients managed with active surveillance had data and biospecimens collected for germline genetic analyses. RESULTS: Of 6,775 men included in the analysis, 2,260 (33.4%) converted to treatment at a median followup of 6.7 years. Earlier conversion was associated with higher Gleason grade groups (GG2 vs GG1 adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.36-1.82; ≥GG3 vs GG1 aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29-2.43), serum prostate specific antigen concentrations (aHR per 5 ng/ml increment 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25), tumor stages (cT2 vs cT1 aHR 1.58, 95% CI 1.41-1.77; ≥cT3 vs cT1 aHR 4.36, 95% CI 3.19-5.96) and number of cancerous biopsy cores (3 vs 1-2 cores aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.37-1.84; ≥4 vs 1-2 cores aHR 3.29, 95% CI 2.94-3.69), and younger age (age continuous per 5-year increase aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99). Patients with high-volume GG1 tumors had a shorter interval to conversion than those with low-volume GG1 tumors and behaved like the higher-risk patients. We found no significant association between the time to conversion and self-reported race or genetic ancestry. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter time to conversion from active surveillance to treatment was associated with higher-risk clinicopathological tumor features. Furthermore, patients with high-volume GG1 tumors behaved similarly to those with intermediate and high-risk tumors. An exploratory analysis of self-reported race and genetic ancestry revealed no association with the time to conversion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Conduta Expectante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Conduta Expectante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article