Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential drug-drug interactions when managing status epilepticus patients in intensive care: A cohort study.
Le Roux, Clémentine; Destère, Alexandre; Hervy, Sarah; Lloret-Linares, Célia; Reignier, Jean; Caillet, Pascal; Jolliet, Pascale; Mégarbane, Bruno; Boels, David.
Afiliação
  • Le Roux C; Inserm UMRS 1144, University of Paris, France.
  • Destère A; Clinical Toxicology Unit, Pharmacology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Hervy S; Inserm UMRS 1144, University of Paris, France.
  • Lloret-Linares C; SPIN Unit, Public Health Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Reignier J; Inserm UMRS 1144, University of Paris, France.
  • Caillet P; Department of Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Pays de Savoie Private Hospital, Annemasse, France.
  • Jolliet P; Department of Medical Critical Care, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Mégarbane B; SPIN Unit, Public Health Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Boels D; Clinical Toxicology Unit, Pharmacology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(5): 2408-2418, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34907586
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with antiseizure drugs (ASDs) used to manage status epilepticus (SE) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been poorly investigated. We aimed to quantify and describe those potential DDIs and determine SE patient risk profiles.

METHODS:

We conducted an observational bi-centric cohort study including all SE patients admitted to the ICU in the period 2016-2020.

RESULTS:

Overall, 431 SE patients were included and 5504 potential DDIs were identified including 1772 DDIs (33%) between ASDs, 2610 DDIs (47%) between ASDs and previous usual treatments (PUTs), and 1067 DDIs (20%) between ASDs and ICU treatments (ICUTs). DDIs were moderate (n = 4871), major (n = 562) or severe (n = 16). All patients exhibited potential DDIs, which were major-to-severe DDIs in 47% of the cases. DDIs were pharmacokinetic (n = 1972, 36%), mostly involving cytochrome P450 modulators, and pharmacodynamic (n = 3477, 64%), mainly leading to increased sedation. ASD/PUT DDIs were the most frequent and severe. Age, PUT and ASD drug numbers and length of ICU stay were significantly associated with increased DDI number. We identified four SE patient profiles with different DDI risks and outcomes including (1) epileptic or brain trauma patients, (2) withdrawal syndrome patients, (3) older patients with comorbidities and (4) self-poisoned patients with psychiatric disorders and/or past epilepsy.

CONCLUSION:

SE patients are subject to potential DDIs between ASDs, ASD/PUT and ASD/ICUT. Major-to-severe DDIs mostly occur between ASDs and PUTs. Physicians should pay attention to SE patient characteristics and history to limit DDI numbers and prevent their consequences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Epiléptico / Cuidados Críticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Epiléptico / Cuidados Críticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article