Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study.
Choi, Ga-Young; Han, Chang-Hee; Lee, Hyung-Tak; Paik, Nam-Jong; Kim, Won-Seok; Hwang, Han-Jeong.
Afiliação
  • Choi GY; Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
  • Han CH; Department of Software, College of Software Convergence, Dongseo University, Busan, 47011, South Korea.
  • Lee HT; Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
  • Paik NJ; Interdisciplinary Graduate Program for Artificial Intelligence Smart Convergence Technology, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, South Korea.
  • Kim WS; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Hwang HJ; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, 13620, Republic of Korea. wondol77@gmail.com.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 18(1): 176, 2021 12 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34930380
BACKGROUND: To apply transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to the motor cortex, motor hotspots are generally identified using motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor-hotspot-identification approach using a machine learning technique as a potential alternative to TMS. METHODS: EEG data were measured using 63 channels from thirty subjects as they performed a simple finger tapping task. Power spectral densities of the EEG data were extracted from six frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and full) and were independently used to train and test an artificial neural network for motor hotspot identification. The 3D coordinate information of individual motor hotspots identified by TMS were quantitatively compared with those estimated by our EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification approach to assess its feasibility. RESULTS: The minimum mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach was 0.22 ± 0.03 cm, demonstrating the proof-of-concept of our proposed EEG-based approach. A mean error distance of 1.32 ± 0.15 cm was measured when using only nine channels attached to the middle of the motor cortex, showing the possibility of practically using the proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach based on a relatively small number of EEG channels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of our novel EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification method. It is expected that our approach can be used as an alternative to TMS for motor hotspot identification. In particular, its usability would significantly increase when using a recently developed portable tES device integrated with an EEG device.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroencefalografia / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroencefalografia / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article