Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Coaching on Process Outcomes in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Ballengee, Lindsay A; Rushton, Sharron; Lewinski, Allison A; Hwang, Soohyun; Zullig, Leah L; Ricks, Katharine A Ball; Ramos, Katherine; Brahmajothi, Mulugu V; Moore, Thomasena S; Blalock, Dan V; Cantrell, Sarah; Kosinski, Andrzej S; Gordon, Adelaide; Ear, Belinda; Williams, John W; Gierisch, Jennifer M; Goldstein, Karen M.
Afiliação
  • Ballengee LA; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA. Lindsay.ballengee@duke.edu.
  • Rushton S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Lindsay.ballengee@duke.edu.
  • Lewinski AA; School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hwang S; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
  • Zullig LL; School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Ricks KAB; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Ramos K; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
  • Brahmajothi MV; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Moore TS; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Service Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Blalock DV; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
  • Cantrell S; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Kosinski AS; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gordon A; Department of Medicine Geriatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Ear B; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Williams JW; Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gierisch JM; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
  • Goldstein KM; Durham Center of Innovation To Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(4): 885-899, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34981354
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A culture of improvement is an important feature of high-quality health care systems. However, health care teams often need support to translate quality improvement (QI) activities into practice. One method of support is consultation from a QI coach. The literature suggests that coaching interventions have a positive impact on clinical outcomes. However, the impact of coaching on specific process outcomes, like adoption of clinical care activities, is unknown. Identifying the process outcomes for which QI coaching is most effective could provide specific guidance on when to employ this strategy.

METHODS:

We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2021. Studies that addressed the effects of QI coaching on process of care outcomes were included. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS:

We identified 1983 articles, of which 23 cluster-randomized trials met eligibility criteria. All but two took place in a primary care setting. Overall, interventions typically targeted multiple simultaneous processes of care activities. We found that coaching probably has a beneficial effect on composite process of care outcomes (n = 9) and ordering of labs and vital signs (n = 6), and possibly has a beneficial effect on changes in organizational process of care (n = 5), appropriate documentation (n = 5), and delivery of appropriate counseling (n = 3). We did not perform meta-analyses because of conceptual heterogeneity around intervention design and outcomes; rather, we synthesized the data narratively. Due to imprecision, inconsistency, and high risk of bias of the included studies, we judged the certainty of these results as low or very low.

CONCLUSION:

QI coaching interventions may affect certain processes of care activities such as ordering of labs and vital signs. Future research that advances the identification of when QI coaching is most beneficial for health care teams seeking to implement improvement processes in pursuit of high-quality care will support efficient use of QI resources. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION This study was registered and followed a published protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020165069).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Melhoria de Qualidade / Tutoria Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Melhoria de Qualidade / Tutoria Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article