Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-Reported Conflicts of Interests and Financial Disclosures in The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Casciato, Dominick J; Brown, Joey; Yancovitz, Sara; Mendicino, Robert W.
Afiliação
  • Casciato DJ; Resident Physician, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus Ohio, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: dominick.casciato@ohiohealth.com.
  • Brown J; Resident Physician, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus Ohio, Columbus, OH.
  • Yancovitz S; Resident Physician, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus Ohio, Columbus, OH.
  • Mendicino RW; Residency Director, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus Ohio, Columbus, OH.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 61(5): 1119-1123, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35221220
ABSTRACT
Industry, academia, and professional societies provide financial and in-kind support for physician-lead research; however, the prevalence and role remain unreported. From consultancies to leadership positions, foot and ankle surgeons receive a spectrum of support. To provide transparency between these relationships and published outcomes, journals report conflicts of interest (COI) and financial disclosures (FD). This investigation analyzes self-reported COIs and FDs in The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery (JFAS)®. A systematic review of manuscripts reporting COIs and FDs from the January 2008 through November 2020 issues of JFAS was conducted. Editorials, commentaries, and technique articles were excluded. Disclosure type, level of evidence, and affiliated country of authorship were collected. Trends and proportions of articles with disclosures were analyzed from before a published Open Payments Database (OPD) (2008-2013) through 2020. Among 2699 articles, 382 reported a COI or FD. The number of manuscripts with COIs and FDs increased since 2008 (p < .001). The proportion of articles with COIs or FDs was greater after the OPD was published compared to prior (p < .001). Overall, 86.35% of reported COIs were industry related while 37.09% of FDs were hospital, university, or state sponsor affiliated. International authorship was a negative predictor of COIs and FDs (p < .001). Level 3 and 4 studies were 4.60 (95%CI [0.85-24.85]) and 5.56 (95%CI [1.04-29.72]) times as likely to have self-reported a COI compared to level 1 studies, respectively. Level 2 and 5 studies were 0.33 (95%CI [0.04-3.16]) and 0.36 (95%CI [0.04-3.13]) times as likely to have self-reported a FD compared to level 1 studies, respectively. This investigation found an increase in the proportion of manuscripts with self-reported COIs and FDs since first documented in JFAS. These findings illustrate the ubiquity of author industry involvement, though future studies may examine the relevancy of these roles to published research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conflito de Interesses / Revelação Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conflito de Interesses / Revelação Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article