Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results for colorectal cancer risk stratification: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients presenting to primary care.
Withrow, Diana R; Shine, Brian; Oke, Jason; Tamm, Andres; James, Tim; Morris, Eva; Davies, Jim; Harris, Steve; East, James E; Nicholson, Brian D.
Afiliação
  • Withrow DR; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Shine B; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK.
  • Oke J; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Tamm A; Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • James T; Department of Computer Science, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Morris E; Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Davies J; Department of Computer Science, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Harris S; Oxford BRC Informatics Theme, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • East JE; Translational Gastroenterology Unit, and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Nicholson BD; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. brian.nicholson@phc.ox.ac.uk.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 116, 2022 03 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35287679
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used to triage primary care patients with symptoms that could be caused by colorectal cancer for referral to colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine whether combining FIT with routine blood test results could improve the performance of FIT in the primary care setting.

METHODS:

Results of all consecutive FITs requested by primary care providers between March 2017 and December 2020 were retrieved from the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographic factors (age, sex), reason for referral, and results of blood tests within 90 days were also retrieved. Patients were followed up for incident colorectal cancer in linked hospital records. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of FIT alone, FIT paired with blood test results, and several multivariable FIT models, were compared.

RESULTS:

One hundred thirty-nine colorectal cancers were diagnosed (0.8%). Sensitivity and specificity of FIT alone at a threshold of 10 µg Hb/g were 92.1 and 91.5% respectively. Compared to FIT alone, blood test results did not improve the performance of FIT. Pairing blood test results with FIT increased specificity but decreased sensitivity. Multivariable models including blood tests performed similarly to FIT alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

FIT is a highly sensitive tool for identifying higher risk individuals presenting to primary care with lower risk symptoms. Combining blood test results with FIT does not appear to lead to better discrimination for colorectal cancer than using FIT alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article