Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Baseline Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) Predicts Radiologic Response and Overall Survival in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy.
Neuberger, Manuel; Skladny, Janina; Goly, Nora; Wessels, Frederik; WEIß, Christel; Egen, Luisa; Erben, Philipp; GROß-Weege, Matthias; Grüne, Britta; Hartung, Friedrich; Herrmann, Jonas; Honeck, Patrick; Jarczyk, Jonas; Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich; Mühlbauer, Julia; Nitschke, Katja; Nientiedt, Malin; Walach, Margarete Theresa; Waldbillig, Frank; Westhoff, Niklas; VON Hardenberg, Jost; Kriegmair, Maximilian; Worst, Thomas S; Nuhn, Philipp.
Afiliação
  • Neuberger M; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; manuel.neuberger@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
  • Skladny J; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Goly N; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Wessels F; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • WEIß C; Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Egen L; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Erben P; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • GROß-Weege M; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Grüne B; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Hartung F; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Herrmann J; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Honeck P; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Jarczyk J; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Kowalewski KF; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Mühlbauer J; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Nitschke K; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Nientiedt M; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Walach MT; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Waldbillig F; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Westhoff N; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • VON Hardenberg J; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Kriegmair M; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Worst TS; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Nuhn P; Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Anticancer Res ; 42(4): 1911-1918, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35347010
BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the baseline inflammatory markers modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as pragmatic tools for predicting response to chemohormonal therapy (docetaxel plus ADT) and prognosis in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male patients who received docetaxel at a tertiary university care center between 2014 and 2019 were screened for completion of 6 cycles. NLR, SII, mGPS, overall survival (OS), three-year survival, and radiologic response were assessed. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) were analyzed alone and in combination. RESULTS: Thirty-six mHSPC-patients were included. In thirty patients, baseline mGPS was assessed and was either 0 (n=22) or 2 (n=8). In Cochran-Armitage Trend Test, mGPS showed significant association with the combined radiologic endpoint of "CR, PR, or SD" (p=0.01), three-year survival (p=0.02), and OS (p<0.01). Next to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (HR per 100 units 1.16, 95%CI=1.04-1.30, p<0.01), NLR (HR=1.31, 95%CI=1.03-1.66, p=0.03), and mGPS (2 vs. 0, HR=6.53, 95%CI=1.6-27.0, p<0.01) at baseline showed significant association with OS in univariable cox regression. However, mGPS remained the only independent predictor for OS in multivariable cox regression (p<0.01) and for the combined radiologic endpoint of "CR, PR or SD" (p=0.01) in multivariable logistic regression. SII showed no statistical relevance. CONCLUSION: Baseline mGPS seems to be a pragmatic tool for clinical decision-making in patients with mHSPC in daily routine.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article