Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography With Shear Wave Dispersion Imaging in the Preoperative Evaluation of Hepatic Parenchyma in Patients With Liver Tumors.
Wang, Kun; Zhang, Shuchen; Zhou, Wenyan; Wen, Li; Zhang, Shanshan; Yu, Dong.
Afiliação
  • Wang K; Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou, China.
  • Zhang S; Department of Ultrasound, Yancheng City, No. 1 People' s Hospital, Yancheng, China.
  • Zhou W; Department of Ultrasound, Yancheng City, No. 1 People' s Hospital, Yancheng, China.
  • Wen L; Function, The Special Care Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China.
  • Zhang S; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Yu D; Department of Ultrasound, North China Medical Treatment Health Group, Fengfeng General Hospital, Handan, China.
J Ultrasound Med ; 42(4): 797-807, 2023 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35730210
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) with that of shear wave dispersion (SWD) in evaluation of hepatic parenchyma in patients with liver tumors before resection.

METHODS:

A total of 174 patients with liver tumors were prospectively enrolled. SWE and SWD examinations were performed. Fibrosis stage and necroinflammatory activity were determined histopathologically according to the Scheuer standard. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of SWE and SWD.

RESULTS:

Both SWE and SWD values of the liver were highly correlated with liver fibrosis stage (P < .05, respectively). Both SWE and SWD values of the liver were moderately correlated with necroinflammatory activity (P < .05, respectively). Both SWE and SWD values of the liver were not correlated with steatosis (P > .05, respectively). Both SWE and SWD values were significantly different among the patients with different stages of liver fibrosis (P < .001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of SWE value was 0.982, 0.977, 0.969, and 0.984 for predicting S ≥ 1, S ≥ 2, S ≥ 3, and S = 4, respectively. The optimal cutoff SWE values were 6.9, 7.9, 8.7, and 10.6 kPa for S ≥ 1, S ≥ 2, S ≥ 3, and S = 4, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of SWD value was 0.967, 0.960, 0.925, and 0.954 for predicting S ≥ 1, S ≥ 2, S ≥ 3, and S = 4, respectively. The optimal cutoff SWD values were 11.2, 12.0, 13.2, and 16.0 m/s/kHz for S ≥ 1, S ≥ 2, S ≥ 3, and S = 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

SWE and SWD could be noninvasive and accurate for predicting the stage of liver fibrosis in patients with liver tumors before surgery. SWE was more accurate than SWD in predicting severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3) and cirrhosis (S = 4).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article