Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraoperative Blood Loss Estimation in Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery- Relevant, Not Reported, Not Standardized: Results From a Systematic Review and a Worldwide Snapshot Survey.
Perri, Giampaolo; Marchegiani, Giovanni; Reich, Federico; Casetti, Luca; Fontana, Martina; Esposito, Alessandro; Ruzzenente, Andrea; Salvia, Roberto; Bassi, Claudio.
Afiliação
  • Perri G; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Marchegiani G; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Reich F; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Casetti L; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Fontana M; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Esposito A; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Ruzzenente A; Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Salvia R; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Bassi C; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Ann Surg ; 277(4): e849-e855, 2023 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837979
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To provide an overview of the current practice of intraoperative blood loss (BL) estimation in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

BACKGROUND:

Intraoperative BL is a major quality marker in HPB surgery and a predictor of perioperative outcomes. However, the method for BL estimation is not standardized.

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed of original studies published between 2006 and 2021 reporting the intraoperative BL of patients undergoing pancreatic or hepatic resections. A web-based snapshot survey was distributed globally to all members of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA).

RESULTS:

A total of 806 studies were included; 480 (60%) had BL as their primary outcome, and 105 (13%) had BL as their secondary outcome. However, 669 (83%) did not specify how BL estimation was performed, and 9 different methods were found among the remaining 136 (17%) studies.The survey was completed by 252 surgeons. Most of the responders (94%) declared that they systematically performed BL estimation and considered BL predictive of postoperative complications after pancreatic (73%) and liver (74%) resection. All methods previously identified in the literature were used by responders with different frequencies. A calculation based on suction fluid amounts, operative gauze weight, and irrigation was the most used method in the literature (7%) and among responders (51%). Most responders (83%) felt that BL estimation in HPB surgery needs improved standardization.

CONCLUSIONS:

Standardization of intraoperative BL estimation is urgently needed in HPB surgery to ensure the consistency of reporting and reproducibility.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar / Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar / Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article