Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Zang, Wanli; Fang, Mingqing; He, He; Mu, Liang; Zheng, Xiaoqin; Shu, Heng; Ge, Nan; Wang, Su.
Afiliação
  • Zang W; Postgraduate School, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Fang M; Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • He H; Winter Olympic Academy, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Mu L; Winter Olympic Academy, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Zheng X; Postdoctoral Research Station, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Shu H; Postgraduate School, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Ge N; Postgraduate School, University of Harbin Sport, Harbin, China.
  • Wang S; School of Physical Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Public Health ; 10: 1040704, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36530731
ABSTRACT

Background:

To provide reliable evidence to exercise rehabilitation therapists and clinicians, we compared and analyzed the effects of different exercise modalities on cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients using Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methods:

PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORT Discus, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to July 20, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials comparing 12 exercise modalities to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in hemodialysis patients. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA and R.

Result:

A total of 82 randomized controlled trials involving 4146 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in this study. The pair-wise meta-analysis showed that all exercise modalities had a positive effect on all indicators of cardiorespiratory capacity. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Blood flow restriction training (BFRT), Cycle exercise (CE), Inspiratory muscle training (IMT), Combined aerobic and resistance training (CT), and Aerobic training (AT) were significantly better than usual care for 6-min walkability; Medium intensity continuous training (MICT), CT, CE, and AT were considerably better than usual care for VO2Peak; body and mind training (MBT) and CT significantly improved SBP compared to usual care; and only MBT was significantly better than usual care for DBP. Both the two-dimensional plot and the radar plot demonstrated that CT had the best combined-effect on each index of cardiorespiratory fitness. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results. The evidence was mainly "low" to "very low" for this network meta-analysis.

Conclusion:

There is no one exercise that can achieve the best effect on all of the outcomes. The benefits of MBT in decreasing arterial blood pressure are unsurpassed by other exercise methods. The intervention effect of the CT is better and more stable. Electrical muscle stimulation training (MEST) can be employed in individuals who do not wish to exercise actively but may cause an increase in blood pressure. On the basis of the characteristics of different exercise types, guidelines developers, clinicians, and patients may employ them appropriately. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Terapia por Exercício Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Terapia por Exercício Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article