Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated Patient-level Prostate Cancer Detection with Quantitative Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Zhong, Allison Y; Digma, Leonardino A; Hussain, Troy; Feng, Christine H; Conlin, Christopher C; Tye, Karen; Lui, Asona J; Andreassen, Maren M S; Rodríguez-Soto, Ana E; Karunamuni, Roshan; Kuperman, Joshua; Kane, Christopher J; Rakow-Penner, Rebecca; Hahn, Michael E; Dale, Anders M; Seibert, Tyler M.
Afiliação
  • Zhong AY; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Digma LA; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Hussain T; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Feng CH; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Conlin CC; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Tye K; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Lui AJ; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Andreassen MMS; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Rodríguez-Soto AE; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Karunamuni R; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Kuperman J; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Kane CJ; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Rakow-Penner R; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Hahn ME; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Dale AM; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Seibert TM; Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 47: 20-28, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36601040
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), but the subjective Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) system and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are inconsistent. Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is an advanced diffusion-weighted MRI technique that yields a quantitative imaging biomarker for csPCa called the RSI restriction score (RSIrs). Objective: To evaluate RSIrs for automated patient-level detection of csPCa. Design setting and participants: We retrospectively studied all patients (n = 151) who underwent 3 T mpMRI and RSI (a 2-min sequence on a clinical scanner) for suspected prostate cancer at University of California San Diego during 2017-2019 and had prostate biopsy within 180 d of MRI. Intervention: We calculated the maximum RSIrs and minimum ADC within the prostate, and obtained PI-RADS v2.1 from medical records. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We compared the performance of RSIrs, ADC, and PI-RADS for the detection of csPCa (grade group ≥2) on the best available histopathology (biopsy or prostatectomy) using the area under the curve (AUC) with two-tailed α = 0.05. We also explored whether the combination of PI-RADS and RSIrs might be superior to PI-RADS alone and performed subset analyses within the peripheral and transition zones. Results and limitations: AUC values for ADC, RSIrs, and PI-RADS were 0.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.58), 0.78 (0.70, 0.85), and 0.77 (0.70, 0.84), respectively. RSIrs and PI-RADS were each superior to ADC for patient-level detection of csPCa (p < 0.0001). RSIrs alone was comparable with PI-RADS (p = 0.8). The combination of PI-RADS and RSIrs had an AUC of 0.85 (0.78, 0.91) and was superior to either PI-RADS or RSIrs alone (p < 0.05). Similar patterns were seen in the peripheral and transition zones. Conclusions: RSIrs is a promising quantitative marker for patient-level csPCa detection, warranting a prospective study. Patient summary: We evaluated a rapid, advanced prostate magnetic resonance imaging technique called restriction spectrum imaging to see whether it could give an automated score that predicted the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. The automated score worked about as well as expert radiologists' interpretation. The combination of the radiologists' scores and automated score might be better than either alone.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article