Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer in Brazil: An Analysis of a Private Healthcare System Database.
Fontes, Mariane S; Schutz, Fabio A; de Almeida Luz, Murilo; Bomfim, Giovanni; Saturnino, Luciana Tarbes Mattana; Goncalves, Sarah Carolina; Soler, Roberto.
Afiliação
  • Fontes MS; Uro-oncologia, Grupo Oncoclinicas, Rio de Janeiro 22410-003, Brazil.
  • Schutz FA; Medical Oncology, Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01323-001, Brazil.
  • de Almeida Luz M; Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba 81520-060, Brazil.
  • Bomfim G; Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Brazil, Sao Paulo - SP 04583-110, Brazil.
  • Saturnino LTM; Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Brazil, Sao Paulo - SP 04583-110, Brazil.
  • Goncalves SC; Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Brazil, Sao Paulo - SP 04583-110, Brazil.
  • Soler R; Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Brazil, Sao Paulo - SP 04583-110, Brazil.
World J Oncol ; 13(6): 350-358, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660210
ABSTRACT

Background:

With the ongoing expansion of life-prolonging therapies approved to treat advanced prostate cancer, there is currently an unmet need to better understand real-world treatment patterns and identify optimal treatment sequencing for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Methods:

In this retrospective, observational cohort analysis, patients with confirmed mCRPC were identified in the Auditron claims database and used to describe mCRPC treatment patterns and trends in the Brazilian private healthcare system from 2014 to 2019. Demographics and clinical characteristics, prostate cancer stage at diagnosis, and type and number of treatment lines were evaluated. The primary endpoint was identification of the drugs used in first-line therapies in mCRPC, and the secondary endpoint included a description of sequential lines of therapy (second and third lines) in mCRPC.

Results:

A total of 168 electronic patient records were reviewed. Docetaxel was the most frequently used first-line treatment (35.7%), followed by abiraterone (33.3%) and enzalutamide (13.1%). Docetaxel, abiraterone, and enzalutamide also accounted for 34.6%, 28.0%, and 15.0%, respectively, of second-line therapies. In third-line therapies, cabazitaxel (26.1%), enzalutamide (23.9%), docetaxel (15.2%), and abiraterone (15.2%) were most commonly prescribed. Irrespective of stage at diagnosis, treatment patterns were similar once the disease progressed to the metastatic castration-resistance stage.

Conclusions:

Docetaxel was the most frequently utilized therapy for mCRPC treatment, followed by abiraterone and enzalutamide. Although the current analyses provide real-world insights into treatment patterns for patients with mCRPC in Brazil, additional real-world data are needed to further validate and expand on these findings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article