Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine based on triptan treatment experience: Pooled results from three phase 3 randomized clinical trials.
Lipton, Richard B; Blumenfeld, Andrew; Jensen, Christopher M; Croop, Robert; Thiry, Alexandra; L'Italien, Gilbert; Morris, Beth A; Coric, Vladimir; Goadsby, Peter J.
Afiliação
  • Lipton RB; Departments of Neurology, Epidemiology and Population Health, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Blumenfeld A; Headache Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
  • Jensen CM; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Croop R; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Thiry A; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • L'Italien G; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Morris BA; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Coric V; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Goadsby PJ; NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility @ King's College Hospital/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, UK.
Cephalalgia ; 43(2): 3331024221141686, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739511
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This post-hoc analysis from three phase 3 treatment trials of rimegepant 75 mg - an oral small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for acute and preventive treatment of migraine - assessed efficacy in adults with migraine based on triptan treatment experience.

METHODS:

Participants were assigned to one of four groups based on triptan treatment experience insufficient response (e.g. lack of efficacy and/or poor tolerability) to 1 triptan, insufficient response to ≥2 triptans, current triptan users, and triptan-naïve participants. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom at two hours postdose.

RESULTS:

In the three trials (N = 3507; rimegepant n = 1749, placebo n = 1758), 1235 (35.2%) participants had a history of insufficient response to 1 triptan (n = 910 [25.9%]) or ≥2 triptans (n = 325 [9.3%]), and 2272 (64.8%) had no history of insufficient response to triptans (current use = 595 [17.0%], naïve = 1677 [47.8%]). Rimegepant was effective on the co-primary endpoints in all subgroups (p ≤ 0.013), except for freedom from the most bothersome symptom in the triptan-naïve group (p = 0.06). No differences on co-primary endpoints were found in pairwise comparisons of rimegepant-treated participants.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rimegepant was effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults with a history of insufficient response to 1 or ≥2 triptans and in current triptan users. Efficacy on co-primary endpoints did not differ based on the number of insufficient triptan responses.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03235479, NCT03237845, NCT03461757.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triptaminas / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triptaminas / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article