Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally.
Malherbe, H L; Modell, B; Blencowe, H; Strong, K L; Aldous, C.
Afiliação
  • Malherbe HL; Centre for Human Metabolomics, North-West University, North-West Province, Potchefstroom, South Africa. research@rarediseases.co.za.
  • Modell B; Rare Diseases South Africa NPC, The Station, 63 Peter Place, Bryanston, Johannesburg, 2021, Gauteng, South Africa. research@rarediseases.co.za.
  • Blencowe H; University College London, London, UK.
  • Strong KL; Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Aldous C; Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Aging, Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Community Genet ; 14(3): 241-262, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093545
ABSTRACT
Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as "congenital". This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article