Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Explant vs Redo-TAVR After Transcatheter Valve Failure: Mid-Term Outcomes From the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR International Registry.
Tang, Gilbert H L; Zaid, Syed; Kleiman, Neal S; Goel, Sachin S; Fukuhara, Shinichi; Marin-Cuartas, Mateo; Kiefer, Philipp; Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed; De Backer, Ole; Søndergaard, Lars; Saha, Shekhar; Hagl, Christian; Wyler von Ballmoos, Moritz; Bhadra, Oliver; Conradi, Lenard; Grubb, Kendra J; Shih, Emily; DiMaio, J Michael; Szerlip, Molly; Vitanova, Keti; Ruge, Hendrik; Unbehaun, Axel; Kempfert, Jorg; Pirelli, Luigi; Kliger, Chad A; Van Mieghem, Nicholas; Hokken, Thijmen W; Adrichem, Rik; Modine, Thomas; Corona, Silvia; Wang, Lin; Petrossian, George; Robinson, Newell; Meier, David; Webb, John G; Cheung, Anson; Ramlawi, Basel; Herrmann, Howard C; Desai, Nimesh D; Andreas, Martin; Mach, Markus; Waksman, Ron; Schults, Christian C; Ahmad, Hasan; Goldberg, Joshua B; Geirsson, Arnar; Forrest, John K; Denti, Paolo; Belluschi, Igor; Ben-Ali, Walid.
Afiliação
  • Tang GHL; Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: gilbert.tang@mountsinai.org.
  • Zaid S; Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Kleiman NS; Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Goel SS; Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Fukuhara S; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Marin-Cuartas M; Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Kiefer P; Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Abdel-Wahab M; Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
  • De Backer O; The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Søndergaard L; The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Saha S; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
  • Hagl C; Ludwig Maximillian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Wyler von Ballmoos M; Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bhadra O; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Conradi L; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Grubb KJ; Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Shih E; Baylor Scott and White Health, Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • DiMaio JM; Baylor Scott and White Health, Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Szerlip M; Baylor Scott and White Health, Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Vitanova K; German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Ruge H; German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Unbehaun A; German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Kempfert J; German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Pirelli L; Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
  • Kliger CA; Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
  • Van Mieghem N; Eramus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hokken TW; Eramus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Adrichem R; Eramus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Modine T; UMCV Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Corona S; UMCV Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Wang L; St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, USA.
  • Petrossian G; St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, USA.
  • Robinson N; St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, USA.
  • Meier D; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Webb JG; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Cheung A; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Ramlawi B; Lankanau Heart Institute at Main Line Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Herrmann HC; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Desai ND; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Andreas M; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mach M; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Waksman R; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Schults CC; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Ahmad H; Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
  • Goldberg JB; Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
  • Geirsson A; Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Forrest JK; Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Denti P; San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Belluschi I; San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Ben-Ali W; Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(8): 927-941, 2023 04 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100556
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Valve reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) failure has not been studied in detail.

OBJECTIVES:

The authors sought to determine outcomes of TAVR surgical explantation (TAVR-explant) vs redo-TAVR because they are largely unknown.

METHODS:

From May 2009 to February 2022, 396 patients in the international EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR registry underwent TAVR-explant (181, 46.4%) or redo-TAVR (215, 54.3%) for transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure during a separate admission from the initial TAVR. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 1 year.

RESULTS:

The incidence of reintervention after THV failure was 0.59% with increasing volume during the study period. Median time from index-TAVR to reintervention was shorter in TAVR-explant vs redo-TAVR (17.6 months [IQR 5.0-40.7 months] vs 45.7 months [IQR 10.6-75.6 months]; P < 0.001], respectively. TAVR-explant had more prosthesis-patient mismatch (17.1% vs 0.5%; P < 0.001) as the indication for reintervention, whereas redo-TAVR had more structural valve degeneration (63.7% vs 51.9%; P = 0.023), with a similar incidence of ≥moderate paravalvular leak between groups (28.7% vs 32.8% in redo-TAVR; P = 0.44). There was a similar proportion of balloon-expandable THV failures (39.8% TAVR-explant vs 40.5% redo-TAVR; P = 0.92). Median follow-up was 11.3 (IQR 1.6-27.1 months) after reintervention. Compared with redo-TAVR, TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days (13.6% vs 3.4%; P < 0.001) and 1 year (32.4% vs 15.4%; P = 0.001), with similar stroke rates between groups. On landmark analysis, mortality was similar between groups after 30 days (P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this first report of the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR global registry, TAVR-explant had a shorter median time to reintervention, with less structural valve degeneration, more prosthesis-patient mismatch, and similar paravalvular leak rates compared with redo-TAVR. TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year, but similar rates on landmark analysis after 30 days.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article