Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cross-sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management consensus guidelines.
Vadaparampil, Susan T; Fuzzell, Lindsay N; Brownstein, Naomi C; Fontenot, Holly B; Lake, Paige; Michel, Alexandra; McIntyre, McKenzie; Whitmer, Ashley; Perkins, Rebecca B.
Afiliação
  • Vadaparampil ST; Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Fuzzell LN; Office of Community Outreach, Engagement, and Equity, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Brownstein NC; Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Fontenot HB; Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Lake P; Nancy Atmospera-Walch School of Nursing, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Michel A; Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • McIntyre M; Nancy Atmospera-Walch School of Nursing, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Whitmer A; Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Perkins RB; Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Cancer ; 129(17): 2671-2684, 2023 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221653
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk-based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline-adherent management of abnormal results.

METHODS:

To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross-sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low-risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high-risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines.

RESULTS:

A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent.

CONCLUSIONS:

Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. PLAIN LANGUAGE

SUMMARY:

The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow-up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Colposcopia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Colposcopia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article