Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Respiratory protection: what SARS-CoV-2 has taught us.
Loeb, Mark.
Afiliação
  • Loeb M; Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(4): 276-280, 2023 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260261
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the epidemiological evidence for respiratory personal protective equipment for SARA-CoV-2, a topic of considerable controversy. RECENT FINDINGS: The main findings are that the observational studies and non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) randomized trials do not provide clear evidence that the N95 respirators offer superior protection over surgical masks. A randomized controlled trial on COVID-19 provides evidence that the absolute risk to healthcare workers over time using surgical masks is similar to N95 respirators. SUMMARY: The implications of the findings are that surgical masks and N95 respirators can be considered for respiratory protection in healthcare workers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article