Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of clinical criteria for the evaluation of indirect restorations.
Montenegro, Silvana Pizzini; Ramidan, Juliana Cabral; Michelon, Marcela Mendes Medeiros; Breves, Ricardo Caldeira; Fonseca, Giuliana Vasconcelos de Souza; Teixeira, Mayla Kezy Silva; Lourenço, Eduardo José Veras; Telles, Daniel de Moraes.
Afiliação
  • Montenegro SP; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Ramidan JC; Central Dental Clinic, Division of Prosthodontics, Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Michelon MMM; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Breves RC; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Fonseca GVS; Central Dental Clinic, Division of Prosthodontics, Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Teixeira MKS; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Lourenço EJV; Central Dental Clinic, Division of Prosthodontics, Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Telles DM; Marcílio Dias Navy Hospital, Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 35(8): 1301-1314, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462351
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To propose the development and validation of criteria for evaluating the clinical performance of indirect restorations, considering the variables related to the operator, material, and/or patient. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The experimental design of this study was divided into three stages. Stage 1 development of the new criteria items by specialists in Prosthodontics. Step 2 creation of the criteria, named UERJ criteria, with the description of the parameters that indicate the quality of the restoration, the possible associated complications, and a detailed description of each classification. As well as the development of a form of variables. Step 3 validation of the UERJ criteria.

RESULTS:

Cohen's Kappa statistic registered for both intra- and inter-examiner agreements a coefficient >0.91 with a p-value <0.0001. The validity of the UERJ criteria was evaluated by tests of sensitivity (0.96) and specificity (0.91) and had a satisfactory accuracy (92.7%), a positive (10.99), and negative (0.05) likelihood ratio and high values predictive variables, with positive (PPV) 0.84 (high specificity) and negative (VPN) 0.98 (high sensitivity), with a confidence interval of 95%.

CONCLUSION:

The UERJ criteria is a valid instrument for evaluating the clinical performance of indirect restorations. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

The UERJ criteria, developed exclusively for the analysis of indirect restorations, elucidates the details necessary to identify the causes of failures and complications of these restorations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Compostas / Restauração Dentária Permanente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Compostas / Restauração Dentária Permanente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article