Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HPV self-sampling among women in the United States: preferences for implementation.
Garg, Ashvita; Galvin, Annalynn M; Griner, Stacey B; Rosberger, Zeev; Daley, Ellen M; Thompson, Erika L.
Afiliação
  • Garg A; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA. garga@musc.edu.
  • Galvin AM; Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. garga@musc.edu.
  • Griner SB; Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Rosberger Z; Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Daley EM; Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Thompson EL; Department of Oncology, Psychiatry and Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(1): 167-176, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37633857
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

With the inclusion of primary HPV testing in 2018 U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce guidelines, at-home HPV self-sampling may provide a future option for cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations in the U.S. This study evaluated the association of implementation preferences with the willingness of at-home HPV self-sampling.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2018 among U.S. women ages 30-65 years, without a hysterectomy (n = 812). The outcome was willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling (yes/no). Primary predictor variables (i.e., information source, methods of payment, methods of sending or receiving self-sampling kits) measured self-sampling implementation preferences. Adjusted logistic regression identified associations with willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling.

RESULTS:

Participants who preferred receiving information from healthcare providers (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.54,4.52) or from media or other sources (OR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.51,3.48) had higher HPV self-sampling willingness than participants who did not prefer those sources. Participants who did not want to pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.21; 95% CI 0.14,0.32) or did not know if they would pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.22,0.54) had lower odds of HPV self-sampling willingness compared to participants willing to pay. Participants who did not know which method they preferred for receiving a self-sampling kit (OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.07,0.31) or preferred delivering the sample to the lab themselves (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36,0.96) had lower odds for self-sampling willingness compared to participants who preferred the mail.

CONCLUSION:

Understanding the preferences of women regarding the implementation of HPV self-sampling can improve uptake in cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article