Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the root canal morphology of primary molars.
Rahmati, Afsaneh; Khoshbin, Elham; Shokri, Abbas; Yalfani, Hadis.
Afiliação
  • Rahmati A; Endodontic department, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • Khoshbin E; Endodontic department, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. elham.khoshbin@gmail.com.
  • Shokri A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • Yalfani H; Private Practice, Hamadan, Iran.
BMC Oral Health ; 23(1): 692, 2023 09 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749546
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the root canal morphology of primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated 60 maxillary and mandibular primary first and second molars on CBCT scans of patients retrieved from the archives of Hamadan School of Dentistry between 2018-2020. The teeth were evaluated regarding the number of roots and canals, canal type according to the Vertucci's classification, and root surface concavities. Data were analyzed descriptively and by independent t-test. RESULTS: The most frequent number of canals and roots in the maxillary right and left first molars was 3 canals (60%) and 3 roots (80%). These values were 4 canals (80%) and 5 canals (50%) with 3 roots in the maxillary right and left second molars, respectively, 4 canals (100%) and 2 roots (50%), and 3 canals (60%) and 2 roots (50%) in mandibular right and left first molars, respectively, and 4 canals (92.3%) and 3 roots (61.5%) in mandibular right and left second molars. Vertucci's type IV was the most common canal type in mesial and distal canals, type I was the most common in mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, distobuccal, and distolingual, and types I and II were the most common in the palatal canal. The maximum and minimum concavities were noted in the buccal (26.7%) and mesial (8.3%) surfaces, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variation exists in the number of roots and canals of maxillary and mandibular primary molars, which calls for further attention in treatment of such teeth.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento do Canal Radicular / Cavidade Pulpar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento do Canal Radicular / Cavidade Pulpar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article