Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care.
Abbatantuono, Chiara; Alfeo, Federica; Clemente, Livio; Lancioni, Giulio; De Caro, Maria Fara; Livrea, Paolo; Taurisano, Paolo.
Afiliação
  • Abbatantuono C; Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBrain), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
  • Alfeo F; Department of Education, Communication and Psychology (For.Psi.Com), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
  • Clemente L; Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBrain), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
  • Lancioni G; Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBrain), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
  • De Caro MF; Lega F D'Oro Research Center, 60027 Osimo, Italy.
  • Livrea P; Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBrain), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
  • Taurisano P; Villa Anita, SP22, 70038 Terlizzi, Italy.
Brain Sci ; 13(10)2023 Oct 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37891810
ABSTRACT
Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute to understanding the conversion from an asymptomatic stage to a very mild one, eventually leading to obvious disease. The present review examines different diagnostic approaches in view of neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence of NCD progression, which may be subdivided into (1) preclinical stage; (2) transitional stage; (3) prodromal or mild stage; (4) major NCD. The absence of univocal criteria and the adoption of ambiguous or narrow labels might complicate the diagnostic process. In particular, it should be noted that (1) only neuropathological hallmarks characterize preclinical NCD; (2) transitional NCD must be assessed through proactive neuropsychological protocols; (3) prodromal/mild NCDs are based on cognitive functional indicators; (4) major NCD requires well-established tools to evaluate its severity stage; (5) insight should be accounted for by both patient and informants. Therefore, the examination of evolving epidemiological and clinical features occurring at each NCD stage may orient primary and secondary care, allowing for more targeted prevention, diagnosis, and/or treatment of both cognitive and functional impairment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article