Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound characteristics of breast fibromatosis mimicking carcinoma.
Su, Huan-Zhong; Huang, Mei; Li, Zhi-Yong; Tu, Jin-Hua; Hong, Long-Cheng; Zhang, Zuo-Bing; Zhang, Xiao-Dong.
Afiliação
  • Su HZ; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Huang M; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Li ZY; Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
  • Tu JH; Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Hong LC; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Zhang ZB; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Zhang XD; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 52(2): 144-151, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991026
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To explore the value of ultrasound (US) characteristics in diagnosing breast fibromatosis (BF) and evaluate their differences from breast carcinoma.

METHODS:

A total of 121 patients with BF (n = 24, 29 lesions) or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n = 97, 102 lesions) of the breast were included. Their clinical and US findings were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS:

The mean age of BF was younger than that of IDC (28.75 ± 5.55 vs. 50.19 ± 9.87, p < 0.001). The mean size of the BF was smaller than that of IDC (2.09 ± 0.91 vs. 2.71 ± 1.20, p = 0.011). Compared to IDC, BF had more frequency of posterior echo attenuation (p < 0.001), less frequency of peripheral hyperechoic halo (p = 0.002), calcification (p = 0.001), US reported axillary lymph node positive (p = 0.025), and grade 2-3 vascularity (p < 0.001). The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categorized BF at a lower level than IDC (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, the peripheral hyperechoic halo, posterior echo feature, and vascularity could independently identify the differences between these two entities.

CONCLUSION:

Some differences were observed between BF and IDC in terms of patient age, lesion size, and US characteristics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article