Diagnostic Precision or Pitfalls: How to Apply the New Acute Myeloid Leukemia Classification Systems?
Acta Haematol
; 147(2): 122-132, 2024.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38071966
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has long been overseen by the World Health Organization (WHO) and published into a series of "Blue Books." These ledgers serve as the reference manual for AML classification and, in turn, classification-based treatment decisions. In 2022, two separate groups, each of which included hematologic oncologists, hematopathologists, and geneticists - developed and published two parallel classification systems for AML. One is from the WHO (WHO 5th edition), and a second is from an International Advisory Consortium (International Consortium Classification [ICC]).SUMMARY:
Both modern classification systems originated from the revised 4th edition of the WHO Blue Books and thus share many similarities. There are never-the-less several important differences with the potential to substantially alter disease classification, access to clinical trials, and treatment decision-making. In this manuscript, we review the organization of the WHO and ICC classification systems for AML with emphasis on their similarities and differences, followed by areas in which their application to clinical scenarios may present difficulties. KEY MESSAGES (1) The ICC and WHO 5th edition are concordant for the majority of AMLs. (2) Key differences between AML classification by the ICC and WHO 5th edition include (a) the overall framework of classification, (b) AML-defining blast threshold, definition of myelodysplasia-related AML, and (c) strategy for assigning therapy-related or germline-associated AML modifiers.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Síndromes Mielodisplásicas
/
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article