Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting Histologic Grade of Meningiomas Using a Combined Model of Radiomic and Clinical Imaging Features from Preoperative MRI.
Park, Jae Hyun; Quang, Le Thanh; Yoon, Woong; Baek, Byung Hyun; Park, Ilwoo; Kim, Seul Kee.
Afiliação
  • Park JH; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
  • Quang LT; Department of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
  • Yoon W; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
  • Baek BH; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
  • Park I; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SK; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
Biomedicines ; 11(12)2023 Dec 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38137489
ABSTRACT
Meningiomas are common primary brain tumors, and their accurate preoperative grading is crucial for treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the value of radiomics and clinical imaging features in predicting the histologic grade of meningiomas from preoperative MRI. We retrospectively reviewed patients with intracranial meningiomas from two hospitals. Preoperative MRIs were analyzed for tumor and edema volumes, enhancement patterns, margins, and tumor-brain interfaces. Radiomics features were extracted, and machine learning models were employed to predict meningioma grades. A total of 212 patients were included. In the training group (Hospital 1), significant differences were observed between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas in terms of tumor volume (p = 0.012), edema volume (p = 0.004), enhancement (p = 0.001), margin (p < 0.001), and tumor-brain interface (p < 0.001). Five radiomics features were selected for model development. The prediction model for radiomics features demonstrated an average validation accuracy of 0.74, while the model for clinical imaging features showed an average validation accuracy of 0.69. When applied to external test data (Hospital 2), the radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.72 and accuracy of 0.69, while the clinical imaging model achieved an AUC of 0.82 and accuracy of 0.81. An improved performance was obtained from the model constructed by combining radiomics and clinical imaging features. In the combined model, the AUC and accuracy for meningioma grading were 0.86 and 0.73, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential value of radiomics and clinical imaging features in predicting the histologic grade of meningiomas. The combination of both radiomics and clinical imaging features achieved the highest AUC among the models. Therefore, the combined model of radiomics and clinical imaging features may offer a more effective tool for predicting clinical outcomes in meningioma patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article