Subspecialized breast pathologists have suboptimal interobserver agreement in Ki-67 evaluation using 20% as the cutoff.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ki-67 expression levels in breast cancer have prognostic and predictive significance. Therefore, accurate Ki-67 evaluation is important for optimal patient care. Although an algorithm developed by the International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) improves interobserver variability, it is tedious and time-consuming. In this study, we simplify IKWG algorithm and evaluate its interobserver agreement among breast pathologists in Ki-67 evaluation. METHODS: Six subspecialized breast pathologists (4 juniors, 2 seniors) assessed the percentage of positive cells in 5% increments in 57 immunostained Ki-67 slides. The time spent on each slide was recorded. Two rounds of ring study (R1, R2) were performed before and after training with the modified IKWG algorithm (eyeballing method at 400× instead of counting 100 tumor nuclei per area). Concordance was assessed using Kendall's and Kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Analysis of ordinal scale ratings for all categories with 5% increments showed almost perfect agreement in R1 (0.821) and substantial in R2 (0.793); Seniors and juniors had substantial agreement in R1 (0.718 vs. 0.649) and R2 (0.756 vs. 0.658). In dichotomous scale analysis using 20% as the cutoff, the overall agreement was moderate in R1 (0.437) and R2 (0.479), among seniors (R1 0.436; R2 0.437) and juniors (R1 0.445; R2 0.505). Average scoring time per case was higher in R2 (71 vs. 37 s). CONCLUSION: The modified IKWG algorithm does not significantly improve interobserver agreement. A better algorithm or assistance from digital image analysis is needed to improve interobserver variability in Ki-67 evaluation.