Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review.
Ghosh, Nirjhar R; Esmaeilinezhad, Zahra; Zajac, Joanna; Creasy, Rebecca A; Lorenz, Saundra G; Klatt, Kevin C; Bala, Malgorzata M; Beathard, Karen M; Johnston, Bradley C.
Afiliação
  • Ghosh NR; Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Esmaeilinezhad Z; Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Zajac J; Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
  • Creasy RA; Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Lorenz SG; Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Klatt KC; Department of Nutrition Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
  • Bala MM; Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
  • Beathard KM; Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Johnston BC; Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA. Electronic address: bradley.johnston@tamu.edu.
J Nutr ; 154(4): 1414-1427, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159813
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence-based practice (EBP) promotes shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to determine EBP competencies among nutrition professionals and students reported in the literature.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review by searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, BIOSIS Citation Index, and clinicaltrials.gov up to March 2023. Eligible primary studies had to assess one of the 6 predefined EBP competencies formulating clinical questions; searching literature for best evidence; assessing studies for methodological quality; effect size; certainty of evidence for effects; and determining the applicability of study results considering patient values and preferences. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, and results were summarized for each EBP competency.

RESULTS:

We identified 12 eligible cross-sectional survey studies, comprising 1065 participants, primarily registered dietitians, across 6 countries, with the majority assessed in the United States (n = 470). The reporting quality of the survey studies was poor overall, with 43% of items not reported. Only 1 study (8%) explicitly used an objective questionnaire to assess EBP competencies. In general, the 6 competencies were incompletely defined or reported (e.g., it was unclear what applicability and critical appraisal referred to and what study designs were appraised by the participants). Two core competencies, interpreting effect size and certainty of evidence for effects, were not assessed.

CONCLUSIONS:

The overall quality of study reports was poor, and the questionnaires were predominantly self-perceived, as opposed to objective assessments. No studies reported on competencies in interpreting effect size or certainty of evidence, competencies essential for optimizing clinical nutrition decision-making. Future surveys should objectively assess core EBP competencies using sensible, specific questionnaires. Furthermore, EBP competencies need to be standardized across dietetic programs to minimize heterogeneity in the training, understanding, evaluation, and application among dietetics practitioners. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022311916.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article