Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating MedDRA-to-ICD terminology mappings.
Zhang, Xinyuan; Feng, Yixue; Li, Fang; Ding, Jin; Tahseen, Danyal; Hinojosa, Ezekiel; Chen, Yong; Tao, Cui.
Afiliação
  • Zhang X; McWilliam School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Feng Y; School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Li F; McWilliam School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Ding J; McWilliam School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Tahseen D; McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hinojosa E; McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Chen Y; The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Tao C; McWilliam School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Cui.Tao@uth.tmc.edu.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 23(Suppl 4): 299, 2024 Feb 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326827
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In this era of big data, data harmonization is an important step to ensure reproducible, scalable, and collaborative research. Thus, terminology mapping is a necessary step to harmonize heterogeneous data. Take the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) for example, the mapping between them is essential for drug safety and pharmacovigilance research. Our main objective is to provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the mapping status between MedDRA and ICD. We focus on evaluating the current mapping status between MedDRA and ICD through the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM). We summarized the current mapping statistics and evaluated the quality of the current MedDRA-ICD mapping; for unmapped terms, we used our self-developed algorithm to rank the best possible mapping candidates for additional mapping coverage.

RESULTS:

The identified MedDRA-ICD mapped pairs cover 27.23% of the overall MedDRA preferred terms (PT). The systematic quality analysis demonstrated that, among the mapped pairs provided by UMLS, only 51.44% are considered an exact match. For the 2400 sampled unmapped terms, 56 of the 2400 MedDRA Preferred Terms (PT) could have exact match terms from ICD.

CONCLUSION:

Some of the mapped pairs between MedDRA and ICD are not exact matches due to differences in granularity and focus. For 72% of the unmapped PT terms, the identified exact match pairs illustrate the possibility of identifying additional mapped pairs. Referring to its own mapping standard, some of the unmapped terms should qualify for the expansion of MedDRA to ICD mapping in UMLS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classificação Internacional de Doenças / Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classificação Internacional de Doenças / Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article