Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks: An Anatomical Challenge between Scylla and Charybdis?
Litz, Rainer J; Feigl, Georg C; Radny, Daniel; Weiß, Thomas; Schwarzkopf, Peter; Mäcken, Tim.
Afiliação
  • Litz RJ; Independent Researcher, 86199 Augsburg, Germany.
  • Feigl GC; Institute of Anatomy, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany.
  • Radny D; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
  • Weiß T; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Thurgau Cantonal Hospital, 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland.
  • Schwarzkopf P; Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative and Pain Medicine, Sana Hospital Leipziger Land, 04552 Borna, Germany.
  • Mäcken T; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, 44789 Bochum, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(2)2024 Jan 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38399521
ABSTRACT
Brachial plexus blocks at the interscalene level are frequently chosen by physicians and recommended by textbooks for providing regional anesthesia and analgesia to patients scheduled for shoulder surgery. Published data concerning interscalene single-injection or continuous brachial plexus blocks report good analgesic effects. The principle of interscalene catheters is to extend analgesia beyond the duration of the local anesthetic's effect through continuous infusion, as opposed to a single injection. However, in addition to the recognized beneficial effects of interscalene blocks, whether administered as a single injection or through a catheter, there have been reports of consequences ranging from minor side effects to severe, life-threatening complications. Both can be simply explained by direct mispuncture, as well as undesired local anesthetic spread or misplaced catheters. In particular, catheters pose a high risk when advanced or placed uncontrollably, a fact confirmed by reports of fatal outcomes. Secondary catheter dislocations explain side effects or loss of effectiveness that may occur hours or days after the initial correct function has been observed. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, this appears logical the catheter tip must be placed near the plexus in an anatomically tight and confined space. Thus, the catheter's position may be altered with the movement of the neck or shoulder, e.g., during physiotherapy. The safe use of interscalene catheters is therefore a balance between high analgesia quality and the control of side effects and complications, much like the passage between Scylla and Charybdis. We are convinced that the anatomical basis crucial for the brachial plexus block procedure at the interscalene level is not sufficiently depicted in the common regional anesthesia literature or textbooks. We would like to provide a comprehensive anatomical survey of the lateral neck, with special attention paid to the safe placement of interscalene catheters.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article