Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interactive boxing-cycling on frailty and activity limitations in frail and prefrail older adults: A randomized controlled trial.
Lin, Yi-Jia; Hsu, Wei-Chun; Wang, Kai Chen; Tseng, Wan-Yan; Liao, Ying-Yi.
Afiliação
  • Lin YJ; Graduate Institute of A.I. Cross-disciplinary Tech, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hsu WC; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wang KC; Department of Neurology, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tseng WY; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Liao YY; Department of Gerontological Health Care, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: yingyi@ntunhs.edu.tw.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 67(4): 101819, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479253
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Frailty is common among older adults, often associated with activity limitations during physical and walking tasks. The interactive boxing-cycling combination has the potential to be an innovative and efficient training method, and our hypothesis was that interactive boxing-cycling would be superior to stationary cycling in improving frailty and activity limitations in frail and prefrail older adults.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the impact of interactive boxing-cycling on frailty and activity limitations in frail and prefrail older adults compared to stationary cycling. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Forty-five participants who met at least one frailty phenotype criteria were randomly assigned to receive either interactive boxing-cycling (n = 23) or stationary-cycling (n = 22) for 36 sessions over 12 weeks. The interactive boxing-cycling was performed on a cycle boxer bike with an interactive boxing panel fixed in front of the bike. The primary outcomes were frailty status, including score and phenotypes. Secondary outcomes included activity limitations during physical and walking tasks. The pre- and post-intervention data of both groups were analyzed using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA.

RESULTS:

Both types of cycling significantly improved frailty scores (p<0.001). Interactive boxing-cycling was more effective than stationary cycling in reversing the frailty phenotype of muscle weakness (p = 0.03, odds ratio 9.19) and demonstrated greater improvements than stationary cycling in arm curl (p = 0.002, η2=0.20), functional reach (p = 0.001, η2=0.22), and grip strength (p = 0.02, η2=0.12) tests. Additionally, interactive boxing-cycling exhibited a greater effect on gait speed (p = 0.02, η2=0.13) and gait variability (p = 0.01, η2=0.14) during dual-task walking.

CONCLUSION:

In frail and prefrail older adults, interactive boxing-cycling effectively improves frailty but is not superior to stationary cycling. However, it is more effective at improving certain activity limitations. REGISTRATION NUMBER TCTR20220328001.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ciclismo / Idoso Fragilizado / Terapia por Exercício / Fragilidade Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ciclismo / Idoso Fragilizado / Terapia por Exercício / Fragilidade Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article